Musharraf challenges Siegels Benazir case

Musharraf challenges Siegels Benazir case
Musharraf challenges Siegels Benazir case RAWALPINDI: Former president information (retd) Pervez Musharraf has challenged America inducer Mark Siegel’s allegations that he had vulnerable the late Benazir Bhutto associate degree exceedingly|in a very} call created to her whereas she was reaching to come to the country once an eight-year voluntary exile.

An Associate in Nursingti-Terrorism Court in Rawalpindi admitted for hearing on Wednesday a petition filed by attorney Farogh Naseem on behalf of the previous military stronman, that asked the court to declare Siegel’s testimony unlawful.

Musharraf aforementioned within the petition that the testimony was recorded in violation of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) as no judicial officer was gift whereas Siegel testified.

He additionally objected to Farooq H. Naek sitting next to Siegel as his advocate whereas he testified.

The petition maintained that Siegel’s testimony lacked transparency and didn’t meet the necessities of the CrPC.

After acceptive the petition for hearing, the court postponed Siegel’s interrogatory by Musharraf’s counsel via video link — that was regular for 7:30pm nowadays.

Know more: Siegel accessible next month, ATC told

While additionally provision a notice to Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) functionary, ATC adjourned the hearing until Nov eleven.

Siegel had recorded his statement before Associate in Nursing ATC on Oct one, wherever he had connected information Musharraf with Ms Bhutto’s murder on the idea that the previous military ruler, despite close threats to her life, deliberately disadvantaged Bhutto of the protection detail, that she due being a former prime minister.

In his statement, the inducer had claimed that palatopharyngoplasty sought-after permission from information Musharraf to bring foreign security personnel with Bhutto and asked for vehicles with tinted glass, however each requests were rejected.

Musharraf had earlier rejected Siegel’s allegations, terming his testimony ‘despicable’.

“I powerfully and without ambiguity reject the claim of Mark Siegel, an in depth authority, paid inducer and author of the last book of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto,” he had aforementioned in a very statement.

“I am dismayed and surprised at adult male Siegel’s assertion that I created a threatening call to Ms Bhutto.
This claim is entirely false, fictitious and seems to be willfully invented.”

Mark Siegel is that the fourth prosecution witness against information Musharraf.
2 witnesses, former interior secretary Kamal Shah of Iran and therefore the former National Crisis Management Cell director general didn’t support the prosecution’s case.
The third witness, former Intelligence Bureau director general Ejaz Shah of Iran, was born by the prosecution.

Comments are closed.